"I felt and feel a bit weird that grief has shaped so much of my work, even though it actually makes sense. In a global community where Black women especially are lauded for resilience, making room for grief was also me making room for rest, for imagining a space to express my grief openly, which is so rarely afforded to many folks, including children. It even made space for humor."
-

WNDB’s Breanna McDaniel, who wrote a powerful piece about depression, dehumanization & racism in academic institutions, and grief in her writing.

image

[Image description: To the right, a headshot of author Breanna McDaniel, a Black woman. To the left, artwork of people holding up signs with phrases like “Black Lives Matter” and “Love Your Neighbor,” excerpted from Breanna’s picture book HANDS UP!, illustrated by Shane W. Evans]

(Source: slj.com)

breanna j. mcdaniel black authors writing depression mental health grief picture books hands up!

Walter Grants are open for submissions now through August 31, 2021! We will award 8 grants of $2000 to unpublished diverse writers & illustrators, including 3 brand new grants, thanks to donors Angie Thomas, A.M. Dassu, Margaret Owen, & Hanna...

Walter Grants are open for submissions now through August 31, 2021! We will award 8 grants of $2000 to unpublished diverse writers & illustrators, including 3 brand new grants, thanks to donors Angie Thomas, A.M. Dassu, Margaret Owen, & Hanna Alkaf.

[Image description: Graphic featuring the WNDB logo, the program application dates (August 1 to August 31, 2021), header text that reads, “WNDB is Open for Walter Grant Submissions!”, and quote text that reads, “The Walter Grant truly helped change my life. Beyond the recognition it gave me, I was able to use the money to buy the laptop which I wrote THE HATE U GIVE on. It’s an honor to now be able to give other writers similar opportunities to fulfill their dreams.” — Angie Thomas, Walter Grant recipient]

walter grants walter grants 2021 wndb programs we need diverse books wndb publishing writing writing opportunities illustration illustration opportunities illustrators writers

to-hurt-and-comfort-deactivated asked:

I'm a POC who writes mainly white characters but after seeing all the "diversity" posts on this site I'm wondering if I may be subconsciously prejudiced and now I don't know what to do. I feel like I've been doing everything wrong and yet I don't want to change my stories/characters to suit everyone else while not liking them myself.

writingwithcolor Answer:

To Write (or not write) with Diversity

No one can force you to write inclusive stories. Inclusive meaning media that consists of marginalized people, because that is what diversity really is - including people who have always been right there, but have been purposefully left out and erased from the pages of books and scripts. Those who are, when finally represented, are overwhelmingly assigned small, unflattering, and / or stereotypical roles.

Pages like Writing With Color are an offering. Our presence here is for those who choose to write with diversity. We aim to make being inclusive easier because we all believe in the importance of it. But as much as we know how enriching diversity can be, we cannot convince you to do something you don’t necessarily believe in.

Don’t do it because you feel forced

As you mentioned, you’ve read the posts. You know the facts. The decision cannot be forced upon you.  If anything, including diversity out of obligation alone could lead to bad representation. Forcing people to do things without motivation usually means it’ll lack effort, or be done with spite. Trust me when I say marginalized people don’t usually want to see themselves represented by someone who does not want them there. That unwelcome feeling shows. In short: Lack of representation hurts. Bad representation hurts worse.

I only ask that you have accountability.  

Now that you’re aware that your works default to white, you have a choice to make. I think a lot of us grew up reading and writing very white stories - both as PoC and white people - but once you possess the knowledge that things can be different, your next step is a conscious one. You’re not on auto-pilot anymore when you make everyone white (and/or straight, able-bodied, etc). You know better now. Own up to your choices.

So ask yourself: why have I chosen to write without diversity?

I’m afraid to write People of Color. 

Being uncomfortable writing People of Color is a big reason why people stick to writing white people, and only garnish their stories with PoC, if that. White people have long been the default, the everyman. White perspectives are “neutral” to approach. It’s daunting to go from feeling you can portray characters in whatever way you wish to suddenly having the weight of good versus harmful representation on your shoulders.

You don’t want backlash from getting it wrong. You also don’t want to be insensitive to groups. It’s easy to avoid writing them altogether, right? Sure. 

Be aware, though:

You’re making a choice to exclude people out of fear.

Of course, new things are scary. But that’s okay! Courage is the ability to do things that frighten you. Face your fears. Will you shrink away from the challenge, or use it to your advantage?

Let the fear fuel you to do better and to know better. Your concerns about writing PoC can drive you to get the research right in order to best represent people. If your fear is leading to more effort into thoughtful creation, you’re putting it to good use.

Let me tell you right now - you will mess up.

Maybe in small ways, perhaps in a big way. But mistakes will not kick start the apocalypse. Ideally:

  1. Do your research to avoid the most obvious and devastating mistakes from the jump.
  2. Equip yourself with the right beta-reader and sensitivity readers to catch those things. 

Even with errors, your story can be quite enjoyable for people who hardly see themselves represented. Yes, mistakes and all.

As a Black woman bookworm, if you write an exciting story about a Black girl on adventures and falling in love but mention a few questionable things about how she takes care of her hair…I will wince, but it won’t ruin the book for me. I’m willing to overlook some things, for the sake of my enjoyment, and let the author know how I felt about those parts in hopes they can improve.

Say you get something real important wrong. People call you out for it. I suggest you apologize, listen to their critiques, and do better. If possible, pull back the story and re-release when you’ve improved the piece. If that’s not an option, fix it in future works. Getting a finger wagged at you doesn’t mean lock up in fear and never write with diversity again. It means you improve.

Research PoC like you would on any topic:

For comparison’s sake, consider writing People of Color (or any group different from you) like writing other topics you’re unfamiliar with in-depth. 

For example: You may know the basics on Medieval England. The knights, royalty, and so on. But i’m sure there’s a lot of misconceptions mixed in there from television or unreliable sources. 

  • To write people from this perspective, you would do lots of additional research… right?  
  • If someone mentioned how you messed up on some of the facts, you would take note and dig into it more for the future…right? 
  • You might even have more experienced persons check your facts for accuracy beforehand to do the best job possible.

Approach researching PoC in the same way as other topics. There may not be hard facts on how to write an X character, but there are portrayals to avoid with explanations why, and roles people want to see themselves in.

I don’t like to be told what to write.

There’s this misconception that writing with diversity restricts creativity. I get it - there are things you’re being told not to do when writing certain groups. The lists of No’s can get dense. This reflects how poor representation has been for People of Color as there are a number of stereotypical portrayals folks are tired of seeing and has been detrimental to them.

Fiction simply reflects real life: People of Color being viewed through the lens of preconceived notions means being written on with those stereotypes in mind. It is a vicious cycle. Stereotypes are more than an annoyance - they can and do lead to real life consequences.

Being treated like a stereotype lowers our quality of life. Experiencing racism and daily microaggressions has a psychological effect - from insecurity, depression and PTSD - it is serious. (X)

Viewing People of Color by their stereotypes is what makes, say, a Black person who speaks with passion no matter what it’s about (and even if they’ve been wronged) too hostile and “Angry” to take seriously. If anything, they’re now a serious threat. And that’s dangerous for them.

Put yourself in the shoes of the overly typecast.

Think of a time someone misunderstood you. You had a bad day and acted grumpy. Well, being a grump defines who you are now. When asked, people describe you as crabby and humorless. Every new person you meet sees your every action through that lens.

Strangers tiptoe around you, as they can just tell you’re ill-tempered. Peers choose their words carefully, afraid of what might spark your wrath. Your children even inherit the title; teachers discipline them more and take other students’ word over theirs- your kids are snappy, difficult, and known to not play well with others, after all.

Wouldn’t that get old? Wouldn’t you feel it was unfair to be reduced to a label, and that you’re sick of being defined by it? Wouldn’t you have the desire to be seen for who you truly are, and can be? Perhaps you do get grumpy sometimes, which is just being human. You’re so much more than a grouch.

Stereotypes are not creative.

Writing outside of stereotypes open up so many more possibilities. How many times have we seen the Black Best Friend play out in media? You’re not being silenced when readers criticize your sassy sidekick. Your message has been heard, loud and clear - again and again and again. People are upset because it’s not anything new - in fact, it is quite old.  We want multiple portrayals. Why not create something new before you decide to write so closely to how we are always written?

OP said: I don’t want to change my stories/characters to suit everyone else while not liking them myself.

This should not be the case. Avoiding stereotypes has nothing to do with making unlikeable or even perfect characters. Simply make Characters of Color who go beyond stereotypes! Characters who are best friends without being arc-less doormats. Characters who are fierce and emotional and stand for something without being simplified to irrational, hostile, and angry. 

Knowing the difference between stereotype and culture is important, too. Don’t let anyone tell you you’re doing something wrong when their bias means they perceive your character as being stereotypical, or problematic, when they’re not. (See: Stereotyped vs Nuanced Characters and Audience Perception.)  

If anything, writing beyond hard labels leads to complex characters. Writing about new cultures is interesting and can be exciting. 

If you only like your East Asian characters when they’re geniuses or your Black girls when they’re angry without a cause…do some self-reflection. Why do your Characters of Color only seem “right” to you when they are flat, or confined to stereotypes? Why not allow them to be complex humans?

I’m not convinced that representation matters.

Well, representation does matter. A lot. While it has been written on so much, and there being countless studies, statistics, and personal accounts to support this, I would like to mention…

Representation (or lack thereof) lowers self-worth.

Studies show TV boosts the self-esteem of white boys. The confidence of People of Color and girls of all races, on the other hand, decreases when watching TV (X X). 

“If you want to make a human being into a monster, deny them, at the cultural level, any reflection of themselves.” -Junot Diaz

The Racial Empathy Gap.

I want to be brief (too late, right?) so let me just mention another point of research for you: the racial empathy gap. Stereotyped depictions and the limited roles for People of Color are internalized by society, leading to lack of empathy towards People of Color and the enforcement of stereotypes in real time. Lack of empathy actively affects how PoC are treated, such as the belief that Black people experience less pain than others and therefore are misdiagnosed (their illnesses and pain are downplayed) and under treated (X X X). 

Fiction Increases Empathy.

In addition to the racial empathy gap, look into the studies on how fiction improves empathy. For example: reading about vampires increases empathy towards vampires. Imagine what non-stereotyped, marginalized depictions in fiction can do for empathy.  (X, X)

The strength in which people are against representation speaks volumes. 

If representation does not matter, then why are some people so angry when it’s there? Let’s take book to movie depictions: 

  • A Character of Color depicted as white simply means they were the best actor for the job, according to a vocal presence in social media. 
  • However, even a verified Character of Color being depicted as such leads to boycotting, accusations of being “Politically-correct”, and wide complaints that they can’t relate to the characters and they are poor actors. Never mind that so many Actors of Color attend prestigious schools only to get so far.

The hypocrisy speaks to a need for more representation, and a prevalent lack of empathy. 

The People Want Diversity!

On a positive note: shows that reflect the real world, aka include diversity, continue to get high ratings despite many obstacles: those who don’t want them there, lack of advertising or inconvenient airtime for shows with diverse leads, the ole bait-and-switch method, and hasty cancellations. Not to mention media simply refusing to be inclusive even when they know “diversity sells” (X X). Gee, I wonder why….

Audiences are more drawn to projects that feature a diverse cast, a new study finds, though mirroring the population in the United States remains a problem.

“Less-diverse product underperforms in the marketplace, and yet it still dominates,” said Ana-Christina Ramón, the report’s co-author and assistant director of the Bunche Center. “This makes no financial sense.” 

-Diversity in Hollywood Pays Off in Ratings and Box Office, New Study Finds

Diversity simply reflects the real world accurately. 

There is nothing forced about diversity. People of Color exist in the real world, go out and about, and have lives. Creators including marginalized people only seems strange because media actively scratches them out as much as possible, pulling the marginalized out of focus to zoom in on white characters. That is what’s unrealistic. 

Ultimately, you, the writer, will write what you want. Just ask yourself why you have decided this is what you want to write. Are you okay with that reason? Despite all the progress that is being made, you’ll blend in just fine with all of the other mostly white books and movies out there. And as people become more conscious and bored with the same stories, we can and will choose to ignore whitewashed media.

The good thing is that there’s so much awareness and activism going on with representation; the path has been paved for you and it is not lonely! 

There are resources out there, and WWC continues to be one of them.

More Reading - Diversity:

–Colette

writing tips writing resources writing

Why The Publishing Industry Can't Get Disability Right - The Establishment

theestablishment.co

Why The Publishing Industry Can't Get Disability Right - The Establishment

In an industry mostly dominated by able people, disability is 'other.'

Since that day, I’ve come back to this question often: what is the reason that we don’t have more portrayals, intersectional and inclusive portrayals, of disability and disabled people? Why are so many stories about disabled people written by our friends, families, and caretakers instead of by us? So many stories about disability only offer pity and inspiration porn, disabled people hailed as “inspirational” solely on the basis of our being disabled. A huge part of that reason is that the people who make choices—about what’s being published, how it’s framed, and who gets to tell disability stories—are often not disabled themselves. To that effect, abled writers, editors, and publishers treat disability as an “outsider” story.

writing disability disability in lit diverse literature publishing actuallyautistic neurodivergent diverse books

Why I Came Out As A Gay Children's Book Author

buzzfeed.com

Why I Came Out As A Gay Children's Book Author

My existence shouldn't be controversial.

What happens if I tell the truth about why I’m not married? What happens if I reveal this part of myself? Does my career in children’s books end? Will teachers and parents look at me askance? Ban my books? Run me out of town as some kind of creep trying to “recruit” or pushing a “gay agenda”? Will I never be invited to another school again?

writing alexander london we need diverse books

beyondvictoriana:
“  Future Imperfect The speculative fiction of UB associate professor Nnedi Okorafor is steeped in a gritty realism
“ Most authors can trace their love of writing back to childhood, but while Okorafor was a precocious reader, she...

beyondvictoriana:

Future Imperfect

The speculative fiction of UB associate professor Nnedi Okorafor is steeped in a gritty realism

Most authors can trace their love of writing back to childhood, but while Okorafor was a precocious reader, she assumed she’d be a professional athlete. She went on to become a track star in high school, despite developing severe scoliosis when she was 13. The summer after her freshman year at the University of Illinois, where she was on the tennis team, she underwent spinal fusion to correct her scoliosis, which doctors said would cripple her within a few years if left untreated.

And this is where Nnedi Okorafor’s own story took a dramatic and potentially tragic turn. A relatively common procedure for athletes, spinal fusion holds a very small risk of causing paralysis—about 1 percent.

“I was 19, and I woke up paralyzed. Turns out I was in that 1 percent. My surgeon was crying—I had just been named Athlete of the Year in Illinois. I went from being the super athlete to being paralyzed within 24 hours. I could either have gone mad in that hospital bed, or found some way to keep myself from going mad. The only way I could stop myself from going mad was by writing stories.”

(Source)

(via disabilityinkidlit)

disability in kidlit writing representation

Anonymous asked:

I have a white protagonist with Asperger's Syndrome. He has a job at his school's library, and he follows the rules very strictly. One of the rules is that he has to keep an eye on patrons in case of tomfoolery. However, the school has a large number of POC students and this character is aware that POC are unfairly stereotyped so he feels conflicted on whether to check on them. Should this even be a problem or mentioned at all? Would this be something he could ask a POC friend about?

writingwithcolor Answer:

Autism*/Aspergers Syndrome and Racial Profiling

It really depends on how much you want to make race an issue in your book. On the one hand, if race is not a prominent issue in other parts of your book it doesn’t make sense to add it a subplot or even a subtle line about it in the library. If it’s not prominent, just don’t mention it. If you don’t want race to have a huge effect in your book, your character could probably just state he told the students in the library to be quiet and not even mention their ethnicities.

If you do want race to play a role in your story (granted if it is something addressed in other parts of the novel), then he might mention the ethnicity of the patrons in the library. If you want race to play a role in your story, you would have to determine how your character became aware of race and racial injustices and prejudice.

I would argue that racism is a learned behavior, so your character might have picked up this awareness from someone else. He might even be hyper aware, to the point where he might be fixated on not offending anyone that he unintentionally offends someone.

If you want your character to ask a friend, it would really depend on what he plans to ask this friend. Some autistic people have trouble asking appropriate questions because they are not aware of the social aspects of the question. He might have the right intentions asking this friend about the issue, but it might not come out in a socially appropriate way. Depending on how aware your character is, he may or may not notice this.

Hopefully his friend is understanding. Your character might even be engaging in inappropriate behaviors that he has to be called out on. (i.e. if he’s following people around or something)  It’s not a bad thing for this particular character, it’s a teaching moment. 

 ~ Mod Najela

*We have edited our original post! Thank you for making us aware of functioning labels and how harmful they are. We apologize for using them and any harm it may have caused. We will not use them again.

writingwithcolor:

corinneduyvis:

life-in-the-margins:

Sorry sorry sorry guys! I’m the writer of the post and I feel so bad. 

What do people actually prefer? Is it person with autism or autistic person or is it just a matter of personal preference and I should always ask beforehand. The place I work really stresses person centered language, which is probably fine for parents, but what do people actually prefer? 

I really apologize about the functioning labels, I hate them too, and I apologize because I had my clinicians hat on when I was writing this post. (also I wasn’t sure because the DSM changed the parameters of Aspergers rolled it into HFA, but the DSM is biased, so thank you for pointing it out to me).

I’m curious though, because what would you prefer that was asked instead of the low/high dichotomy? I typically ask whether someone has language and whether they can follow directions. The only reason why is because I work for an ABA company and I really wish that there was a way to change the language around the office. I constantly hear people saying “Oh, he’s so low…” and it hurts my heart because the kid can do everything independently, but he’s also non-verbal and that is the only thing that would classify him as being “low functioning.” I don’t really understand the criteria for that type of language myself, but the thought of classifying people by “functioning level” is a pervasive thought in ABA therapy and it definitely needs to change. I want to know so I can at least start changing my language and call out the people I supervise to change their language too. 

Person-first/identity-first language really depends on the individual—and sometimes the location (I believe there’s a difference for UK/US).  Many people in the disability movement prefer identity-first language, as “person with autism” makes the autism feel as though it’s a removable trait, separate from the person, rather than an integral part of their person.

It’s also awkward in some contexts; people don’t go out of your way to say “person with blondeness” either.

Plenty of people do prefer person-first language for themselves, and that should always be respected. Self-identification is key.

As far as functioning labels, yes, definitely avoid those. To steal from a document I’ve been working on:

  1. people’s “functioning” varies per skill—people can be nonverbal and live independently, while others are great with communication but need live-in care—or even per day and per situation, so it doesn’t actually convey any information.
  2. the skills that abled society ascribes value to are not the be-all and end-all, and it rubs many disabled people the wrong way to privilege those skills over others.
  3. “high-functioning” is not a compliment or necessarily desirable; for many people, it’s incredibly draining and harmful to appear as such. Moreover, the emphasis on this as something desirable results in abuse by parents, teachers, and doctors.
  4. Using “low-functioning” often results in that person being written off, and “high-functioning” often results in people demanding that person act completely “normal” and them not being given assistance.

So, just focus on what’s necessary for the situation. Describe without judgment what someone is or is not capable of, when that information is relevant. To steal from something I’ve been working on to send a friend, consider these alternatives:

  1. Often the term isn’t necessary at all. Figure out whether the distinction is that important to what is being communicated. “Corinne, who is autistic, wrote a book.” Whether you put high-functioning there  is not terribly relevant to my writing a book and doesn’t actually add much information.

    (Especially when you take into account point a above. How high-functioning I am depends on your perception. I pass as neurotypical in some ways, but a lot of that is because of skills I picked up as a teenager. I dropped out of high school at 14 & can’t handle a job. But that’s not usually the part people imagine when they hear that term, or what people see when I’m in chatterbox mode.)

  2. If it is relevant, just let it become clear through context or describe it.

    “Marie went out to the movies with her friends and chatted in a wine bar until late” = Marie is probably good at coping with crowded environments and enjoys social activities. Note that we can’t make assumptions about her social skills or how draining such a night might be for her.

    “Marie’s aide helped her select her clothes and they planned the day’s meals.” = Marie is probably not living independently.

    Or just go “Devon lives in a group home and relies on disability benefits for income. He has strong verbal skills, but misses social cues.” It takes more words than “high functioning” and “low functioning,” but it also conveys more information. If the character’s situation and skills are genuinely relevant to the conversation, one might as well be specific and accurate.

I don’t know if that helps at all? OP,  I really appreciate WWC and am happy to discuss this further if you want. You’re welcome to email me.

Fellow autistics, please do call me out if I messed up on anything here. 

Corinne Duyvis (who is a writer, co-editor of Disability in Kidlit and a team member of We Need Diverse Books) had this awesome response to our post, and we thought our followers might appreciate seeing it as well. We hope this answers some of the questions/comments we’ve gotten. Thank you so much, Corinne!! 

autism spectrum racial profiling writing writing diversely diversifyyourwriting

Boisterous, eloquent, and just the tiniest bit... | FIRST DRAFT with sarah enni

Advisory board member Cynthia Leitich Smith talks writing and diversity on  firstdraftwithsarahenni And they went out for tacos!

cynthia leitich smith first draft podcast podcast we need diverse books writing paying it forward diversity in ya


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk